Publication

Do explanations make VQA models more predictable to a human?

Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)


Abstract

A rich line of research attempts to make deep neural networks more transparent by generating human-interpretable ‘explanations’ of their decision process, especially for interactive tasks like Visual Question Answering (VQA). In this work, we analyze if existing explanations indeed make a VQA model – its responses as well as failures – more predictable to a human. Surprisingly, we find that they do not. On the other hand, we find that human-in-the-loop approaches that treat the model as a black-box do.

Related Publications

All Publications

ARCH: Animatable Reconstruction of Clothed Humans

Zeng Huang, Yuanlu Xu, Christoph Lassner, Hao Li, Tony Tung

CVPR - June 15, 2020

In Defense of Grid Features for Visual Question Answering

Huaizu Jiang, Ishan Misra, Marcus Rohrbach, Erik Learned-Miller, Xinlei Chen

CVPR - June 14, 2020

Hierarchical Scene Coordinate Classification and Regression for Visual Localization

Xiaotian Li, Shuzhe Wang, Yi Zhao, Jakob Verbeek, Juho Kannala

CVPR - June 13, 2020

Epipolar Transformers

Yihui He, Rui Yan, Katerina Fragkiadaki, Shoou-I Yu

CVPR - June 16, 2020

To help personalize content, tailor and measure ads, and provide a safer experience, we use cookies. By clicking or navigating the site, you agree to allow our collection of information on and off Facebook through cookies. Learn more, including about available controls: Cookies Policy