Publication

Do explanations make VQA models more predictable to a human?

Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)


Abstract

A rich line of research attempts to make deep neural networks more transparent by generating human-interpretable ‘explanations’ of their decision process, especially for interactive tasks like Visual Question Answering (VQA). In this work, we analyze if existing explanations indeed make a VQA model – its responses as well as failures – more predictable to a human. Surprisingly, we find that they do not. On the other hand, we find that human-in-the-loop approaches that treat the model as a black-box do.

Related Publications

All Publications

EMNLP - October 31, 2021

Evaluation Paradigms in Question Answering

Pedro Rodriguez, Jordan Boyd-Graber

ASRU - December 13, 2021

Incorporating Real-world Noisy Speech in Neural-network-based Speech Enhancement Systems

Yangyang Xia, Buye Xu, Anurag Kumar

NAACL - June 6, 2021

Leveraging Slot Descriptions for Zero-Shot Cross-Domain Dialogue State Tracking

Zhaojiang Lin, Bing Liu, Seungwhan Moon, Paul Crook, Zhenpeng Zhou, Zhiguang Wang, Zhou Yu, Andrea Madotto, Eunjoon Cho, Rajen Subba

Uncertainty and Robustness in Deep Learning Workshop at ICML - June 24, 2021

DAIR: Data Augmented Invariant Regularization

Tianjian Huang, Chinnadhurai Sankar, Pooyan Amini, Satwik Kottur, Alborz Geramifard, Meisam Razaviyayn, Ahmad Beirami

To help personalize content, tailor and measure ads, and provide a safer experience, we use cookies. By clicking or navigating the site, you agree to allow our collection of information on and off Facebook through cookies. Learn more, including about available controls: Cookies Policy