Cold Case: the Lost MNIST Digits

Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS)


Although the popular MNIST dataset [LeCun et al., 1994] is derived from the NIST database [Grother and Hanaoka, 1995], the precise processing steps for this derivation have been lost to time. We propose a reconstruction that is accurate enough to serve as a replacement for the MNIST dataset, with insignificant changes in accuracy. We trace each MNIST digit to its NIST source and its rich metadata such as writer identifier, partition identifier, etc. We also reconstruct the complete MNIST test set with 60,000 samples instead of the usual 10,000. Since the balance 50,000 were never distributed, they can be used to investigate the impact of twenty-five years of MNIST experiments on the reported testing performances. Our limited results unambiguously confirm the trends observed by Recht et al. [2018, 2019]: although the misclassification rates are slightly off, classifier ordering and model selection remain broadly reliable. We attribute this phenomenon to the pairing benefits of comparing classifiers on the same digits.

Related Publications

All Publications

ARCH: Animatable Reconstruction of Clothed Humans

Zeng Huang, Yuanlu Xu, Christoph Lassner, Hao Li, Tony Tung

CVPR - June 15, 2020

In Defense of Grid Features for Visual Question Answering

Huaizu Jiang, Ishan Misra, Marcus Rohrbach, Erik Learned-Miller, Xinlei Chen

CVPR - June 14, 2020

Hierarchical Scene Coordinate Classification and Regression for Visual Localization

Xiaotian Li, Shuzhe Wang, Yi Zhao, Jakob Verbeek, Juho Kannala

CVPR - June 13, 2020

Epipolar Transformers

Yihui He, Rui Yan, Katerina Fragkiadaki, Shoou-I Yu

CVPR - June 16, 2020

To help personalize content, tailor and measure ads, and provide a safer experience, we use cookies. By clicking or navigating the site, you agree to allow our collection of information on and off Facebook through cookies. Learn more, including about available controls: Cookies Policy