Cold Case: the Lost MNIST Digits

Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS)


Although the popular MNIST dataset [LeCun et al., 1994] is derived from the NIST database [Grother and Hanaoka, 1995], the precise processing steps for this derivation have been lost to time. We propose a reconstruction that is accurate enough to serve as a replacement for the MNIST dataset, with insignificant changes in accuracy. We trace each MNIST digit to its NIST source and its rich metadata such as writer identifier, partition identifier, etc. We also reconstruct the complete MNIST test set with 60,000 samples instead of the usual 10,000. Since the balance 50,000 were never distributed, they can be used to investigate the impact of twenty-five years of MNIST experiments on the reported testing performances. Our limited results unambiguously confirm the trends observed by Recht et al. [2018, 2019]: although the misclassification rates are slightly off, classifier ordering and model selection remain broadly reliable. We attribute this phenomenon to the pairing benefits of comparing classifiers on the same digits.

Related Publications

All Publications

Towards Automated Neural Interaction Discovery for Click-Through Rate Prediction

Qingquan Song, Dehua Cheng, Eric Zhou, Jiyan Yang, Yuandong Tian, Xia Hu

KDD - August 1, 2020

Vid2Game: Controllable Characters Extracted from Real-World Videos

Oran Gafni, Lior Wolf, Yaniv Taigman

ICLR - March 10, 2020

Word-level Speech Recognition with a Letter to Word Encoder

Ronan Collobert, Awni Hannun, Gabriel Synnaeve

ICML - July 13, 2020

Compositionality and Generalization in Emergent Languages

Rahma Chaabouni, Eugene Kharitonov, Diane Bouchacourt, Emmanuel Dupoux, Marco Baroni

ACL - July 4, 2020

To help personalize content, tailor and measure ads, and provide a safer experience, we use cookies. By clicking or navigating the site, you agree to allow our collection of information on and off Facebook through cookies. Learn more, including about available controls: Cookies Policy