Publication

Jump to better conclusions: SCAN both left and right

Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)


Abstract

Lake and Baroni (2018) recently introduced the SCAN data set, which consists of simple commands paired with action sequences and is intended to test the strong generalization abilities of recurrent sequence-to-sequence models. Their initial experiments suggested that such models may fail because they lack the ability to extract systematic rules. Here, we take a closer look at SCAN and show that it does not always capture the kind of generalization that it was designed for. To mitigate this we propose a complementary dataset, which requires mapping actions back to the original commands, called NACS. We show that models that do well on SCAN do not necessarily do well on NACS, and that NACS exhibits properties more closely aligned with realistic use-cases for sequence-to-sequence models.

Related Publications

All Publications

SIGDIAL - August 1, 2021

Annotation Inconsistency and Entity Bias in MultiWOZ

Kun Qian, Ahmad Berrami, Zhouhan Lin, Ankita De, Alborz Geramifard, Zhou Yu, Chinnadhurai Sankar

Uncertainty and Robustness in Deep Learning Workshop at ICML - August 1, 2020

Tilted Empirical Risk Minimization

Tian Li, Ahmad Beirami, Maziar Sanjabi, Virginia Smith

arxiv - November 1, 2020

The Hateful Memes Challenge: Detecting Hate Speech in Multimodal Memes

Douwe Kiela, Hamed Firooz, Aravind Mohan, Vedanuj Goswami, Amanpreet Singh, Pratik Ringshia, Davide Testuggine

ICML - July 24, 2021

Using Bifurcations for Diversity in Differentiable Games

Jonathan Lorraine, Jack Parker-Holder, Paul Vicol, Aldo Pacchiano, Luke Metz, Tal Kachman, Jakob Foerster

To help personalize content, tailor and measure ads, and provide a safer experience, we use cookies. By clicking or navigating the site, you agree to allow our collection of information on and off Facebook through cookies. Learn more, including about available controls: Cookies Policy