Publication

Jump to better conclusions: SCAN both left and right

Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)


Abstract

Lake and Baroni (2018) recently introduced the SCAN data set, which consists of simple commands paired with action sequences and is intended to test the strong generalization abilities of recurrent sequence-to-sequence models. Their initial experiments suggested that such models may fail because they lack the ability to extract systematic rules. Here, we take a closer look at SCAN and show that it does not always capture the kind of generalization that it was designed for. To mitigate this we propose a complementary dataset, which requires mapping actions back to the original commands, called NACS. We show that models that do well on SCAN do not necessarily do well on NACS, and that NACS exhibits properties more closely aligned with realistic use-cases for sequence-to-sequence models.

Related Publications

All Publications

Interspeech - October 12, 2021

LiRA: Learning Visual Speech Representations from Audio through Self-supervision

Pingchuan Ma, Rodrigo Mira, Stavros Petridis, Björn W. Schuller, Maja Pantic

ICML - July 18, 2021

Latency-Aware Neural Architecture Search with Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization

David Eriksson, Pierce I-Jen Chuang, Samuel Daulton, Peng Xia, Akshat Shrivastava, Arun Babu, Shicong Zhao, Ahmed Aly, Ganesh Venkatesh, Maximilian Balandat

IEEE Transactions on Image Processing Journal - March 9, 2021

Inspirational Adversarial Image Generation

Baptiste Rozière, Morgane Rivière, Olivier Teytaud, Jérémy Rapin, Yann LeCun, Camille Couprie

ICML - July 12, 2020

Lookahead-Bounded Q-Learning

Ibrahim El Shar, Daniel Jiang

To help personalize content, tailor and measure ads, and provide a safer experience, we use cookies. By clicking or navigating the site, you agree to allow our collection of information on and off Facebook through cookies. Learn more, including about available controls: Cookies Policy