Publication

Jump to better conclusions: SCAN both left and right

Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)


Abstract

Lake and Baroni (2018) recently introduced the SCAN data set, which consists of simple commands paired with action sequences and is intended to test the strong generalization abilities of recurrent sequence-to-sequence models. Their initial experiments suggested that such models may fail because they lack the ability to extract systematic rules. Here, we take a closer look at SCAN and show that it does not always capture the kind of generalization that it was designed for. To mitigate this we propose a complementary dataset, which requires mapping actions back to the original commands, called NACS. We show that models that do well on SCAN do not necessarily do well on NACS, and that NACS exhibits properties more closely aligned with realistic use-cases for sequence-to-sequence models.

Related Publications

All Publications

Robust Market Equilibria with Uncertain Preferences

Riley Murray, Christian Kroer, Alex Peysakhovich, Parikshit Shah

AAAI - February 12, 2020

Weak-Attention Suppression For Transformer Based Speech Recognition

Yangyang Shi, Yongqiang Wang, Chunyang Wu, Christian Fuegen, Frank Zhang, Duc Le, Ching-Feng Yeh, Michael L. Seltzer

Interspeech - October 26, 2020

Machine Learning in Compilers: Past, Present, and Future

Hugh Leather, Chris Cummins

FDL - September 14, 2020

Unsupervised Cross-Domain Singing Voice Conversion

Adam Polyak, Lior Wolf, Yossi Adi, Yaniv Taigman

Interspeech - August 8, 2020

To help personalize content, tailor and measure ads, and provide a safer experience, we use cookies. By clicking or navigating the site, you agree to allow our collection of information on and off Facebook through cookies. Learn more, including about available controls: Cookies Policy