Jump to better conclusions: SCAN both left and right

Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)


Lake and Baroni (2018) recently introduced the SCAN data set, which consists of simple commands paired with action sequences and is intended to test the strong generalization abilities of recurrent sequence-to-sequence models. Their initial experiments suggested that such models may fail because they lack the ability to extract systematic rules. Here, we take a closer look at SCAN and show that it does not always capture the kind of generalization that it was designed for. To mitigate this we propose a complementary dataset, which requires mapping actions back to the original commands, called NACS. We show that models that do well on SCAN do not necessarily do well on NACS, and that NACS exhibits properties more closely aligned with realistic use-cases for sequence-to-sequence models.

Related Publications

All Publications

NeurIPS - December 6, 2020

High-Dimensional Contextual Policy Search with Unknown Context Rewards using Bayesian Optimization

Qing Feng, Benjamin Letham, Hongzi Mao, Eytan Bakshy

Innovative Technology at the Interface of Finance and Operations - March 31, 2021

Market Equilibrium Models in Large-Scale Internet Markets

Christian Kroer, Nicolas E. Stier-Moses

Human Interpretability Workshop at ICML - July 17, 2020

Investigating Effects of Saturation in Integrated Gradients

Vivek Miglani, Bilal Alsallakh, Narine Kokhlikyan, Orion Reblitz-Richardson

ICASSP - June 6, 2021

Multi-Channel Speech Enhancement Using Graph Neural Networks

Panagiotis Tzirakis, Anurag Kumar, Jacob Donley

To help personalize content, tailor and measure ads, and provide a safer experience, we use cookies. By clicking or navigating the site, you agree to allow our collection of information on and off Facebook through cookies. Learn more, including about available controls: Cookies Policy