Publication

Evaluation Examples Are Not Equally Informative: How Should That Change NLP Leaderboards?

Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)


Abstract

Leaderboards are widely used in NLP and push the field forward. While leaderboards are a straightforward ranking of NLP models, this simplicity can mask nuances in evaluation items (examples) and subjects (NLP models). Rather than replace leaderboards, we advocate a re-imagining so that they better highlight if and where progress is made. Building on educational testing, we create a Bayesian leaderboard model where latent subject skill and latent item difficulty predict correct responses. Using this model, we analyze the ranking reliability of leaderboards. Afterwards, we show the model can guide what to annotate, identify annotation errors, detect overfitting, and identify informative examples. We conclude with recommendations for future benchmark tasks.


PROJECT CODE

PROJECT PAGE

 

Related Publications

All Publications

Federated Learning for User Privacy and Data Confidentiality Workshop At ICML - July 24, 2021

Federated Learning with Buffered Asynchronous Aggregation

John Nguyen, Kshitiz Malik, Hongyuan Zhan, Ashkan Yousefpour, Michael Rabbat, Mani Malek, Dzmitry Huba

UAI - July 28, 2021

A Nonmyopic Approach to Cost-Constrained Bayesian Optimization

Eric Hans Lee, David Eriksson, Valerio Perrone, Matthias Seeger

Journal of Big Data - July 19, 2021

Cumulative deviation of a subpopulation from the full population

Mark Tygert

Interspeech - August 31, 2021

slimIPL: Language-Model-Free Iterative Pseudo-Labeling

Tatiana Likhomanenko, Qiantong Xu, Jacob Kahn, Gabriel Synnaeve, Ronan Collobert

To help personalize content, tailor and measure ads, and provide a safer experience, we use cookies. By clicking or navigating the site, you agree to allow our collection of information on and off Facebook through cookies. Learn more, including about available controls: Cookies Policy